Artworks / Writings
Sculpting Perception – the Works of HO Siu-kee
Fiona, Wong Lai-ching
It was a warm winter’s day. The ceiling of the zinc-roofed studio appeared to be more than ten feet high. Natural light from outside was absorbed by such cavernous space and became dimmer and dimmer as it penetrated inside the studio. The dimness then turned into the paleness of florescent light. In that tranquil interior, there stood more than ten metal objects, each bearing an extensive void as if waiting to be occupied by the human body at midnight - when man and object find each other to set in motion. This was my first encounter of Ho Siu-kee’s work. Later, we happened to work together at Hong KongArtSchool for ten years. Those ten years had given me a chance to understand the correlation between my friend and his works.
The visit more than 10 years ago did not leave any photos for reference.[1] This, however, has made the impression even more vivid. It is amazing that people sense the world with their own body and construct the reality with their own rules.
The first joke the Creator plays on human beings is to let them see an upside-down image of the world at birth. Human beings learn to revert this image with their intellect to match what they see and where they are. While people may think the brain is the authority in constructing reality, the changes in the body at different stages of life quietly occupy their consciousness and alter this perception. From the desire to expand outward during the prime of life to the feeling of powerless when one is old and weak, just when human beings keep matching the world with their bodies, they also keep testing the reality and the value that they construct. These experiences which could be very emotive in the beginning become a mundane process through life that repeats itself day after day.
The greatness of art lies in its ability to arouse these common experiences and to make further exploration and re-reading. The works of Ho Siu-kee take the bodily experience in daily life as a starting point to examine the existing system with a determination comparable to crossing theRed Sea– through his works he tries to find out new orders, revive what has been forgotten and preview what still cannot be seen.
The three-dimensional nature of sculpture gives this medium the power to transform and represent hidden reality in form of an object. Venus of Willendorf, the stone statue created 25,000 years ago[2], not only shows a plump female body, but also shows the ancient desire to prolong life through reproduction. The will to fight death is an abstract notion. It is similar to our perception of the world and can only be released through a medium. To Ho Siu-kee, the body is the starting point of this process.
At first, Ho Siu-kee made use of his own body as a subject of experience. Through other media, he transformed subjective perceptual experience into concepts that can be interpreted objectively. Thus began a series of exploration in art. When these perceptual experiences involved coherent physical activities, video became a natural medium of expression. But Ho Siu-kee is not contented with using video as a purely recording device. Through the juxtaposition of people and objects, he allowed the act of video-recording to intervene in a new role. The innovative use of this medium adds a certain texture to his works and provides a new interpretation for the relationship between human beings and the media[3]. To take such body activities exclusively as a form of art and classify these works as “performance” is obviously a misunderstanding.
Sometimes, these physical experiences are frozen by Ho Siu-kee to become still objects. The training in traditional sculpture-making in his early years not only enabled Ho Siu-kee to master a set of concrete language in three-dimensional art form, actual hands-on experience had also given strong revelation to Ho Siu-kee’s direction of artistic practice. Once, Ho Siu-kee worked on a wood carving. Scraps of wood fell onto the ground, forming patterns like the radiation of energy. “This is it!” Ho Siu-kee exclaimed. In the process of sculpture-making, the person was fully occupied in sculpting the form and had merged with the object without noticing his own existence. After a round of intense body activity, the person took a rest and looked away from the work. He suddenly found that the scraps of wood on the ground had recorded the body activity just now. Instantly, he was aware that he and the object had separated. This separation also revealed the connection of human being and object a moment before. This awareness caused the person to start looking around and observe the world. The experience of sculpture-making has already existed around us in our life experience. But the acquisition of this sudden enlightenment has to rely on the artist’s special perceptive power which is accumulated through his/her long-term concentration on the surroundings.
The sculptor has to follow the grain of wood during the carving process – this understanding of and response to the material is part of creation. This unique irregularity of natural material is often regarded as a limitation. Art, however, elevates such limitation from reality to spirituality. Long experience in sculpture- making gives Ho Siu-kee a deep understanding of limitation. His works which combine sculptural objects with body gesture are responses in ‘extension’ versus ‘limitation’. This extension does not specifically point at any destination. But it covertly discloses human being’s desire for ‘searching’. Artistic practice is the autobiography that an artist writes with his whole life. It is also a way to extend the constrained body. Ho Siu-kee understands sculpture as an extended experience of the ‘thing’ before and after it is formed. The ‘thing’ becomes a medium of many types of experience, thus pushes sculpture to the exploration between ‘thing’ and ‘non-thing’.
t the end of the article “Things” and “Human” and “the World”[4], Ho Siu-kee introduces himself as a sculptor. His creation has always related to sculpture. It is by no accident that he calls his works sculptures.
For the observer, receiving enlightenment from an artwork is a very pleasant experience. It is equally fascinating to find the presence of the artist. This presence is the soul of the work that reveals an irreplaceable nature, a concern for human beings. In Ho Siu-kee’s work, this presence not only points to his physical body, but is also a quality of himself as a subject of perception.
In his early years, Ho Siu-kee had a strong self-consciousness of his own body which was akin to some sort of narcissism. This narcissism was suppressed yet relieved through his artistic work. After many years of physical practice, his human body has shaped a strong sculptural form which nearly unified with the “thing” in his works. In a series of rigorous self-disciplinary acts, this body drives away consciousness with repeated actions, takes prohibition and self-constraint as training, embodies the sense of being with acts akin to self-torture. It seems that he is contented with the constraint of the reality, but in fact, he tries hard to suppress the natural call that is restless and about to cause trouble.
In recent years, the expressiveness of the body in Ho Siu-kee’s works is gradually replaced by the imagery of things. Sometimes this body is fully entrusted to the sculpture, just like returning to the traditional self-portraiture. In fact, he wants to fade out from the role of an expresser to an observer and take a fresh look at the relationship between the projected self and the environment.[5] From tailor-made body cages to rectangular architectural space; from allowing people’s imagination to participate to inviting them to have first-hand experience,[6] the evolution of the works shows a relief from resistance to acceptance. This embodies the evolution of thought as the artist progresses. Metal softens from a medium for constructing forms to the guidance of light. The mutual harmonization of ‘thing’ and ‘quality’ shows that the artist is entering a new course of development.[7] Writing has become a fellow traveler in this course of development.
To watch Ho Siu-kee’s works, one must also read his writing at the same time. He makes use of writing to demonstrate a self-rereading that is serious and exquisite. Visual art can provide an angle beyond logical thinking while words can break the superstition and taboo of art, so that reason and sensation can reconnect. Works of art is a presentation through imagery. Ho Siu-kee tries to convey complicated concepts into a kind of imagery through writing. Thus he creates a space for playing with reason and sensation. This virtual space, like the void that he constructs in his works, is receiving an unknown entering.
In recent years, Ho Siu-kee focuses on the study of Heidegger’s philosophy and tries to get inspiration through constant rereading. Every time I gaze at Ho Siu-kee’s sculptures, I sense a touch of solitude in the abandoned space that was once filled. Maybe the silence of the thing and the movement of man is, as he says in his article[8], the portraiture of the mortality in human beings.
Fiona, Wong Lai-ching is Lecturer of Hong Kong Art School
[1] In 1998, I coordinated the “Open Studio” event for Fringe Club and paid a visit to Ho Siu-kee’s studio in Yuen Long.
[2] Venus of Willendorf, height:11.1 cm, was found in relics of Old Stone Age in Willendorf inAustria. It is a sculpture of lime estimated that it was made between 22,000 and 24,000 B.C, also an image in the visual study records of Ho Siu-kee .
[3] In the works “Per/Con-ceptual Body” (1999), “Body Memory” (2001), “Counting 1 – 100” (2002), the presentation of video has gone beyond purely recording purpose.
[4] “Things” and “Human” and “the World” is an article written by Ho Siu-kee for the practical utensil research project “The Missing Parts” in 2010. He applied the theory of Martin Heidegger to reread the relationship among things, human being and the world.
[5] In his solo exhibition Body Gesture in 2006, Ho Siu-kee created a series of sculptures with his own postures as the theme.
[6] “A place for the Mind” (2009) constructed a rectangular reading space for one person. One pushes open the door and enters it. There are desk and chair. After having sat down, one faces white light that comes directly and makes one unable to open one’s eyes.
[7] “Aureola No. 1” (2009), a piece of iron plate has many small holes so that light appears as a glimmering pattern.
[8] Refers to the article “Things” and “Human” and “the World”.
雕塑感知──看何兆基作品
黃麗貞
那是個和暖的冬日,由鋅鐵蓋成的工作室,樓底看來有十多呎高,室外自然光線被那深遠的空間吸收,愈走進去,愈見昏暗;然後,昏暗換上光管的蒼白。在那冷靜的工作空間,靜立著十多件金屬器具,每件皆有大片留白,彷彿要留待夜闌人靜時,讓軀體再次進佔,人物互借作出起動。這是我第一次接觸何兆基的作品。往後,於香港藝術學院共事十年,讓我有機會將好友與其創作對應起來。
十多年前的一次拜訪[1],沒有照片參照,印象反而更見立體;人以自身來感知世界,以自己一套法則來建構真實,是何等奇妙之事。
造物主給人開的第一個玩笑,是呱呱墜地時,第一眼見到的那個倒轉的世界;然後人學會以思想力量去抗衡這個影像,令所見與所處接軌。當人以為大腦思維是建構真實的權威時,身體在不同階段的轉變,又悄悄地佔據著人的意識,顛覆大腦思維對外在的感知。由盛年向外擴張的慾望,到年老體衰的無力感,人在一生中不斷以身體對應世界的同時,亦不斷考驗自己所建構的真實和價值。這些曾經蕩氣迴腸的經歴,在日復一日的生活中,卻被淡化成一種理所當然的過程。
藝術偉大之處,在於能喚起這些人人皆有的經歷,作出探究與再讀;何兆基的創作,由種種日常生活中的身體經驗作起點,以再渡紅海的決心,檢視固有的系统,嘗試整理出新秩序,將被遺忘的重讀,對未可見的作出預視。
雕塑的立體性質,賦與這個媒介一種能力,將潛藏於內的真實,經過轉化,具體地呈現為物。維倫多爾夫的維納斯(Venus of Willendorf),那二萬五千年前的石像[2],展現的不單是一具豐滿的女體,而是人以繁殖來延續生命的原始慾望;這種抗衡死亡的精神,無色無相,跟人感知世界一樣,都要藉一個媒介,方才能夠被釋放出來;對於何兆基來說,身體,就成了這媒介的起點。
起初,何兆基以自身作為一個經驗的主體,通過其他媒介,將本來主觀的經驗,轉化為可被客觀解讀的概念,一連串藝術探索就此展開。當這些感知經驗涉及連貫的身體動作時,錄像就成為理所當然的表現媒介。何兆基並未滿足於將錄像作為純記錄的手段,並通過人、物的並置,讓錄像以新角色參與作品,令這種本來沒有物的媒介,在其作品中呈現了某種質感,為人與媒介的關係提供了新的詮釋[3]。以肢體活動作為一種形式,將這些作品歸類為「行為藝術」(performance),顯然是一種誤解。
有時,這些動的身體經驗,又會被凝固成靜物,向雕塑再靠近了一點。早年的傳統雕塑訓練,除了讓何兆基掌握一套強健的雕塑語言外,身體力行的雕塑經驗,對何兆基的創作路向,亦作出了重要的啓示。有次何兆基製作木雕,木碎散落在地上,如同一幅能量散射圖,何兆基說:「就是這樣了!」在雕塑的過程中,人完全專注於塑造物的形態,與物混為一體,並未察覺自己的存在;經過一輪劇烈的身體勞動,人稍作喘息,視線離開雕塑物,赫然發現地上的木碎,竟然記錄了剛才的身體活動,頃刻間察覺人和物的分離;這種分離同時揭示了人與物瞬間前的那種關聯;這種關聯的醒覺,又讓人開始環視四周,關顧世界。所謂雕塑經驗,本己存在於我們周遭,只是,這種頓悟的獲得,有賴於藝術家長期對身邊事物的專注,所累積而成的特殊感知能力。
雕刻木材需要順應紋路,是創造,同時亦是人對物料的反覆理解與回應。天然材質獨有的不定性,在現實生活中,常被理解為一種限制;藝術將這種限制由現實性,提升至精神性來檢視。多年的雕塑經驗,令何兆基對限制有所體會;他的作品,結合雕塑物和肢體語言,以「延伸」對「限制」作出了有力的回應。這種延伸,並未具體地指向任何目的地,卻隱隱地揭示了人對「追尋」本身作為一種目的之慾望。藝術創作是藝術家窮一生而寫成的自傳,亦是讓有限之身得以延伸下去的方法。何兆基將雕塑理解為「物」在其形成的前與後的一種經驗延伸,「物」成為多種經驗的中介者,令其雕塑推向物像與非物像之間的探討。
在《「物」與「人」與「世界」》[4]一文的下款裡,何兆基這樣介紹自己:「何兆基,從事雕塑創作。」他的創作從未離開過雕塑,稱其作品為雕塑,並非偶然。
對於觀者來說,從作品中獲得啓發是一種十分愉快的經驗,而在其中尋找作者的呈現(presence of the artist),亦同樣地引人入勝。這種呈現是作品的靈魂,展示一種不可替代的本質,一種對人的關注。這種呈現在何兆基的作品中不單指向其身體,更是他作為感知主體的特性。
何兆基早年對身體強烈的自覺,幾近自戀;這種被壓抑的自戀,通過創作行為得以舒緩;經年累月的工作鍛鍊,賦與其肉身一種强烈的雕塑感,幾乎與作品中的「物」延為一體。在連串嚴守紀律的自定規條中,這個身軀以重複的動作摳走意識,以禁制與自我約束作修煉,以近乎自虐的行為來體現存在感;像是安份於現實之限制,實在是拼力地遏止著那蠢蠢欲動的原始呼喚。
近年,何兆基作品中身體的表現性,漸被一種物的意象所取代。有時,這個肉身被完全寄托於雕塑物當中,好像是回歸到傳统的自畫像,實在是要淡出為旁觀者,重新窺視那被投射的自己與周遭的關係[5]。由度身訂造的身體外殼,到呈方形的建築空間;由只讓人想像參與,到邀請觀眾親身體驗[6],作品的演化呈現了一種由抗拒到接納的釋放,體現了藝術家成長的心路歷程。金屬由塑造形體的媒介,軟化成光的導引,物與質的互融,顯示作者正在進入一個新的里程[7];文字,成為了這個里程的同行者。
看何兆基的作品,不能不同時閱讀他的文章;他以文字示範一種嚴謹且細膩的自我重讀。視覺藝術能提供邏輯思維以外的角度,反過來文字亦能打破對藝術的迷信與禁忌,讓理性與感知重新接軌。藝術作品是一種通過意象來呈現的表述,何兆基嘗試將複雜的概念以文字傳輸一種意象,締造一個理性、感知的遊玩空間。這個虛有空間,就如他作品中所建構的虛空,正在迎接一種不可知的進駐。
何兆基近年埋首鑽研海德格爾的學說,嘗試在再讀又再讀之中獲得啓發;每次凝視何兆基的雕塑,總會閃過一絲人去樓空的孤寂感;物之默然於人之晃動,也許是他文章之中所提及,人作為「凡人」之有限的一種寫照[8]。
作者為香港藝術學院講師
[1]1998年我為藝穗節統籌工作室開放計劃,曾到何兆基位於元朗的工作室作訪問。
[2] 維倫多爾夫的維納斯(Venus of Willendorf),高11.1厘米,在奧地利維倫多爾夫(Willendorf)附近一舊石器時代遺址發現,由石灰石雕刻而成,估計刻於西元前22,000至24,000年,是何兆基的視覺研究記錄中的一個影像。
[3]在〈感知/身體/概念〉(1999)、〈身體記憶〉(2001)、〈數數 1–100〉(2002)三件作品中,錄像的呈現超越了純記錄的功能。
[4] 《「物」與「人」與「世界」》是何兆基於2010年為「拾遺.補闕」實用器物研究計劃所撰寫的文章,以海德格爾的學說為骨幹,來重讀物、人和世界之間的關係。
[5]在2006年的《姿態身段》之個展中,何兆基創作了一系列以自身形態為主的雕塑。
[6] 〈居心所〉(2009)建構成一個丁方單人閱讀空間,推門內進,內有桌椅,坐下後,正好對著迎面照來,令人睜不開眼的白光。
[7] 〈聖光一號〉(2009),鐵片上散佈小孔,讓光得以一點點地呈現。
[8] 見於《「物」與「人」與「世界」》一文。